Hajra Naz
NEW YORK (AP) — Elon Musk’s social media company, X, has filed a federal lawsuit against New York State, seeking to block a new law that would require platforms to disclose how they manage and moderate problematic online content. The legal challenge echoes a similar battle X waged—and partially won—in California.
The law, signed by Governor Kathy Hochul in late 2023, is set to begin later this year. It requires social media companies to release reports twice a year. These reports must explain what they consider harmful content, like
- Hate speech
- False information
- Extreme views.
They also need to share how they handle such content, how often they take action, and how widely those posts are seen.
X Corp., based in Bastrop, Texas, says the law goes against free speech rights. The company also says it clashes with a federal law from 1996 called Section 230. That law gives social media platforms the freedom to manage content as they see fit, without being held legally responsible.
In the suit, filed Tuesday in federal court in Manhattan, X claims that New York is attempting to “insert itself into the content moderation editorial process” by mandating disclosures that it describes as “politically charged.” The company alleges that the law is designed not just to promote transparency but to publicly pressure platforms to censor or limit constitutionally protected speech that state officials may find objectionable.
“The state is impermissibly trying to generate public controversy about content moderation in a way that will pressure social media companies, such as X Corp., to restrict, limit, disfavor, or censor certain constitutionally protected content on X that the state dislikes,” the complaint reads.
New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office responded to the lawsuit in a brief statement, saying it is reviewing the complaint and “stands ready to defend the constitutionality of our laws.”
Read More: Elon Musk’s xAI Launches API Access for Grok 3 Chatbot
A Push for Transparency or Government Overreach?
The lawmakers who support the law—Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assemblymember Grace Lee—say it’s needed to make social media more open and responsible.
In a 2024 letter to an X lobbyist, they criticized Elon Musk and the platform. They said X has a troubling history of spreading false information and hate speech, which they believe could harm democracy. They think platforms like X need more oversight to build public trust.
The law affects many social media companies, but X has become a major focus in the debate. Since Musk bought Twitter in 2022 and renamed it X, he has changed how the platform works.
He shut down the safety team, stopped enforcing many rules on hate speech, and brought back accounts that were banned for spreading harmful content. He also created a system where users can earn money for posts that get lots of attention, even if the content is controversial.
Critics argue these changes have led to an increase in hate speech and harassment on the platform. Independent watchdogs have published studies documenting a surge in offensive and dangerous content since Musk’s takeover. In response, X has pushed back—even suing a research organization that studies online extremism, though that case was dismissed in March 2025.
Legal Echoes of California’s Law—and X’s Previous Win
The New York law closely mirrors legislation previously passed in California, which also required social media platforms to disclose their content moderation practices and metrics. X sued the state in that case as well, leading to a partial legal victory.
In late 2024, a panel of federal appellate judges temporarily blocked parts of California’s law, citing First Amendment concerns about compelled speech. The state later settled the case, agreeing not to enforce the law’s reporting requirements.
Now, X is hoping for a similar outcome in New York.
Legal experts note that the case may hinge on whether courts interpret the law as a permissible regulatory measure or an unconstitutional attempt to compel speech and editorial decisions from private companies. The outcome could shape the future of digital speech regulation nationwide.
Read More: Elon Musk Activates Starlink in Iran to Counter Mass Internet Blackout
A Larger Battle Over Online Speech and Accountability
This lawsuit is part of a bigger debate: who should decide what people can say online—the government or social media companies?
Some people believe tech companies need to be more open about how they handle harmful or false content. They say this helps protect users and stop the spread of hate or misinformation.
But companies like X, especially under Elon Musk, argue that these rules go too far. They believe being forced to share how they moderate content is a threat to free speech and their right to run their platforms as they choose.
As the case moves forward, it highlights a key challenge of the internet age: finding the right balance between free speech and keeping online spaces safe and fair.
